Warning signs of mass violence in the US?


(MENAFN- The Conversation) There are that comparing President Donald Trump's rhetoric to that of is alarmist, unfair and counterproductive.

And yet, there has been no dearth of such comparisons since the 2016 presidential election. Many commentators have also drawn parallels between the conduct of Trump supporters and .

The comparisons continue today, and Trump's comments in the wake of the attack show why. The president's reference to violence on ' implies moral equivalence, which is a familiar for signaling support to violent groups. His comments give white supremacists and neo-Nazis the of the president of the United States.

Many of these groups explicitly African-Americans, Jews, immigrants and other groups, and are willing to do so through violence. As co-directors of Binghamton University's , we emphasize the importance of recognizing and responding to early warning signs of genocide and atrocity crimes. Usually, government officials, scholars and nongovernmental organizations look for these warning signs in – Syria, Sudan or Burma.

Has the time come to watch for these warning signs in the United States?

Is it possible in the US?

The term 'genocide' invokes images of the Nazis used to exterminate Jews during World War II, the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia and thousands of Tutsi bodies in the in Rwanda. On that scale and in that manner, genocide is highly unlikely in the United States.

But genocidal violence can happen in the U.S. It has happened. Organized policies passed by elected U.S. lawmakers have targeted both and . The threat of is present wherever a country's political leadership tolerates or even encourages acts with an intent to destroy a racial, ethnic, national or religious group, whether in whole or in part.

The Holocaust took the international community by surprise. In hindsight, there were many signs. In fact, scholars have learned about the danger signals for the risk of large-scale violence against vulnerable groups.

In 1996, the founder and first president of the U.S.-based advocacy group , , introduced a model that identified – – that societies frequently pass through on the way to genocidal violence. Stanton's model has its . Like any such model, it can't be applied in all cases and can't predict the future. But it has been influential in our understanding of the sources of mass violence in , , and other nations.

The 10 stages of genocide

The early stages of Stanton's model include 'classification' and 'symbolization.' These are processes in which groups of people are saddled with labels or imagined characteristics that encourage active discrimination. These stages emphasize 'us versus them' thinking, and define a group as 'the other.'

As Stanton makes clear, these processes are universally human. They do not necessarily result in a progression toward mass violence. But they prepare the ground for the next stages: active 'discrimination,' 'dehumanization,' 'organization' and 'polarization.' These middle stages may be of an increasing risk of large-scale violence.

Where are we now?

Trump's political rhetoric helped propel him into office by playing on the fears and resentments of the . He , hinted at , winked at and appealed to . He has demanded discriminatory policies including and .

Classification, symbolization, discrimination and of Muslims, Mexicans, African-Americans, the media and even the political opposition may be leading to polarization, stage six of Stanton's model.

Stanton that polarization further drives wedges between social groups through extremism. Hate groups find an opening to send messages that further dehumanize and demonize targeted groups. Political moderates are edged out of the political arena, and extremist groups attempt to move from the former political fringes into mainstream politics.

Do Trump's implied claims of a moral equivalence between neo-Nazis and counterprotesters in Charlottesville move us closer to the stage of polarization?

Certainly, there are reasons for deep concern. Moral equivalence – the claim that when both 'sides' in a conflict use similar tactics, then one 'side' must be as morally good or bad as the other – is what logicians call an . Philosophers take their red pens to student essays that commit it. But when a president is called on to address his nation in times of political turmoil, the claim of moral equivalence is a lot more than an undergraduate mistake. We suggest this is a deliberate effort to polarize, and an invitation to what comes after polarization.

Responding and preventing

Polarization is a warning of the increased risk of violence, not a guarantee. Stanton's model also argues that every stage offers opportunities for prevention. Extremist groups can have their financial assets frozen. Hate crimes and hate atrocities can be more consistently investigated and prosecuted. Moderate politicians, human rights activists, representatives of threatened groups and members of the independent media can be provided increased security.

Encouraging responses have come from the electorate, business leaders, government officials and the international community. Individuals and groups are following the recommendations for action presented in the Southern Poverty Law Center's in supporting victims, speaking up, pressuring leaders and staying engaged. Business leaders have also with Trump's polarizing statements.

Local governments are declaring themselves or . At the national level, have been made by leaders of all of the military branches.

Several international leaders have also spoken up. German Chancellor Angela Merkel displayed in Charlottesville, and U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May Trump's use of moral equivalence.

In our assessment, these actions represent essential forms of resistance to the movement toward polarization, and they reduce the risks of genocide.


The Conversation

MENAFN2108201701990000ID1095755296


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.