(MENAFNEditorial) When Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced the establishment of a Home Affairs portfolio this week, he 'similar to the Home Office of the United Kingdom'. Drawing inspiration from this British model is worrisome for the immigration portfolio.
Immigration mismanagement
Planning immigration has never been a core task of Britain's Home Office. As political scientist has described, the UK in the 20th century has long managed immigration using its nationality legislation.
Migration management was set to become a priority under the Blair government. Decades after Australia did so, it introduced a .
In practice, the Home Office did not anticipate the from new members of the European Union in the 2000s. This fuelled public concerns that eventually played a crucial role in Brexit.
Immigration-related Home Office activities have been mired in enforcement issues. From the 1980s to the 2000s, asylum applications took years to process.
More recently, European citizens aiming to apply for residency in the post-Brexit UK have faced a bureaucratic nightmare. This has been .
What's in a name?
The Home Office was originally established to protect British citizens, with a focus on Britain's infrastructure and customs, and on the prevention of entry by 'undesirable aliens'. It has historically been inward-looking.
This has also been the case of Australia's Department of Home Affairs, established at Federation in 1901. After the second world war, a distinct Department of Immigration was established to plan and oversee the expansion of the country's population. This was a major strategic and economic goal at the time.
In Australia, both the Department of Home Affairs and the Department of Immigration have co-existed over the years, with two exceptions. From the late 1980s to 2007, the former disappeared as its portfolio was handed to the Department of Justice and Customs. Then, in the early 1970s, the Whitlam government abolished the Department of Immigration, because its administrative culture was considered to still reflect the White Australia policy, which had been effectively scrapped in 1966.
The Fraser government reinstated the Department of Immigration in 1976, this time with a strong multicultural rationale. Home Affairs , while Immigration expanded to become the Department of Immigration and Border Protection.
The 2013 name change already meant the department's focus on immigration became narrower than before. It was now mainly concerned with the admission (or refusal) of immigrants. Settlement and multicultural affairs were transferred to the Department of Human Services.
The newest name change, and its close association with the British model by Turnbull, appears as a symbolic marginalisation of the immigration portfolio. It is not clear yet whether an agency under a Home Affairs 'super-ministry' will carry 'immigration' in its name.
In Britain, the corresponding agency under the purview of the Home Office is called 'UK Visas and Immigration'. Yet it existed for several years as the UK Border Agency (UKBA), with no reference to immigration. The then home secretary, Theresa May, eventually split UKBA in two following that hundreds of thousands of people had entered the UK without the appropriate checks.
Critical timing
The creeping invisibility of the immigration portfolio comes as the government is overseeing to immigration policy, and is increasingly using the rhetoric of putting Australians first.
In April, the admission of skilled migrants was overhauled with the abolition of the 457 visa. The government shortened the list of professions for which skilled foreign workers would be eligible for a four-year visa to Australia, and subsequently for permanent residence.
A is before parliament. It significantly extends the time permanent residents must live in Australia before they can apply for citizenship. It also introduces more stringent English-language proficiency requirements.
The legislation would require citizenship applicants to demonstrate their allegiance to Australia more strongly, with a pledge to Australian values and proof of integration.
It that, rather than encouraging integration, these changes could result in newcomers feeling more distanced from Australia. The disappearance of 'immigration' from the department name may contribute to this uneasiness.
And prospective immigrants to Australia may justifiably fear the changes will cause confusion about division of responsibilities, or a further delay in processing times.
Turnbull has promised the reform will strong oversight mechanisms. He noted that such mechanisms were essential to respect the rights and liberties of 'all Australians'.
As noted, Turnbull did not make any specific reference to the rights and liberties of non-citizens living in Australia. One can thus worry to what extent Australia's 'Home Office' will better protect them.
MENAFN2007201700703606ID1095642527
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.