(MENAFN- The Peninsula) The US Justice Department said yesterday that it is weighing a request by two government inspectors to look into the possible mishandling of classified information in Hillary Clinton's private email account from when she was secretary of state.
The department said it "has received a referral related to the potential compromise of classified information." A Justice Department official said the "referral" is not a request for a criminal investigation into Clinton's emails, thousands of which she handed over to the State Department after resigning in 2013.
Clinton's use of a private email account for her work as America's top diplomat came to light in March and brought criticism from political opponents that she had sidestepped transparency and record-keeping laws.
Clinton, the front-runner to represent the Democratic Party in the November 2016 presidential election, has repeatedly said she broke no laws or rules by eschewing a standard government email account for her State Department work in favor of her private account. She also said she sent no classified information by email.
Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement she "followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials."
The former first lady said she handed to the State Department last year all the work-related emails she had, amounting to some 55,000 printed pages covering her four-year tenure, although her staff have recently acknowledged there are gaps in the records she retained.
Reports about a possible investigation into the emails caused confusion. The New York Times originally reported that two government inspectors general had asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into Clinton's use of her private email account It altered its report on its website overnight without explanation to suggest she personally was not the focus of a criminal referral.
Then, the Justice Department said the inspectors general had requested a criminal investigation into the emails, before backtracking and saying that there was a request for a probe but not a criminal one.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.