403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Amnesty: Turkish police 'fails in Kobani protests'
(MENAFN- The Journal Of Turkish Weekly) Amnesty International has accused the Turkish security forces of using excessive force to police major street protests which erupted in Turkey's southeast last year.
A 22-page report released by Amnesty in Istanbul on Tuesday was also critical of what it termed "a lack of effective investigations into deaths and injuries that occurred".
The deadly protests erupted during last year's Eid al-Adha holiday after Daesh militants entered parts of the Syrian Kurdish town of Kobani on October 6.
The protesters had accused the Turkish government of doing nothing to halt the advance of the extremists into the border town, which became the scene of fierce street battles between Kurdish groups and Daesh militants.
A week of protests and linked large-scale violence left more than 40 people dead, including Kobani protesters, political opponents, bystanders and three police officers, today's report said.
The clashes also saw scores of injuries and the destruction of public and private property across southeastern Turkey and beyond.The protests also caused financial damage in several provinces as government buildings, vehicles and even Red Crescent vans were set ablaze.
Speaking in Istanbul on Tuesday, Andrew Gardner, Amnesty International's researcher on Turkey, said that the report was published after a long investigation in the region and aimed to prevent the reoccurrence of the same incidents.
The 22-page report is based on interviews with victims of the violence, their family members, lawyers, activists and representatives of municipalities and the Ministry of the Interior in the region.
Amnesty says its research was carried out in Diyarbakır, Gaziantep and Siirt in October 2014 and in Cizre, Diyarbakır and Siirt in February 2015.
According to the report, Amnesty received numerous accounts of police officers using firearms in situations where there was no imminent threat to life or serious injury, in order to disperse hostile crowds or to protect public property.
"The circumstances that led to the use of firearms in many cases still remains unclear almost a year after the Kobani protests due to the authorities' failure to effectively investigate the cases of alleged abusive police use of force,"
"However, there is strong evidence that police used excessive or unnecessary force," Gardner said.
"There is a an urgent need for the policing operations to be investigated in terms of their ability to protect individuals, and for lessons to be learnt, planning undertaken and then applied in the event of further violent clashes occurring in the future," Gardner said.
Gardener said that arguments that police intervention in certain protests would escalate tensions are "credible."
"[...] But that does not excuse or explain why the police failed to act when called on to protect individuals under attack or when violence reached a level that deaths or injuries were inevitable," he said.
Gardner said that the response from the authorities since the protests has been "equally bad."
"[...] With provisions within the 'domestic security package' granting police extra authority to use firearms an invitation to apply arbitrary and abusive force, increasing the likelihood of abuses still further," he added.
Following the protests, in March 2015 Parliament passed provisions giving the police more authority.
According to the bill, police can use weapons against those who attack schools, public buildings and places of worship with Molotov bombs, explosives, inflammable materials and other weapons.
Moreover, the bill criminalizes the use of "fireworks, Molotovs, iron balls and straps" in public meetings or demonstrations.
Those who cover their faces partly or entirely during demonstrations that turn into a "propaganda march" for a terrorist organization may face sentences of up to five years in prison.
A 22-page report released by Amnesty in Istanbul on Tuesday was also critical of what it termed "a lack of effective investigations into deaths and injuries that occurred".
The deadly protests erupted during last year's Eid al-Adha holiday after Daesh militants entered parts of the Syrian Kurdish town of Kobani on October 6.
The protesters had accused the Turkish government of doing nothing to halt the advance of the extremists into the border town, which became the scene of fierce street battles between Kurdish groups and Daesh militants.
A week of protests and linked large-scale violence left more than 40 people dead, including Kobani protesters, political opponents, bystanders and three police officers, today's report said.
The clashes also saw scores of injuries and the destruction of public and private property across southeastern Turkey and beyond.The protests also caused financial damage in several provinces as government buildings, vehicles and even Red Crescent vans were set ablaze.
Speaking in Istanbul on Tuesday, Andrew Gardner, Amnesty International's researcher on Turkey, said that the report was published after a long investigation in the region and aimed to prevent the reoccurrence of the same incidents.
The 22-page report is based on interviews with victims of the violence, their family members, lawyers, activists and representatives of municipalities and the Ministry of the Interior in the region.
Amnesty says its research was carried out in Diyarbakır, Gaziantep and Siirt in October 2014 and in Cizre, Diyarbakır and Siirt in February 2015.
According to the report, Amnesty received numerous accounts of police officers using firearms in situations where there was no imminent threat to life or serious injury, in order to disperse hostile crowds or to protect public property.
"The circumstances that led to the use of firearms in many cases still remains unclear almost a year after the Kobani protests due to the authorities' failure to effectively investigate the cases of alleged abusive police use of force,"
"However, there is strong evidence that police used excessive or unnecessary force," Gardner said.
"There is a an urgent need for the policing operations to be investigated in terms of their ability to protect individuals, and for lessons to be learnt, planning undertaken and then applied in the event of further violent clashes occurring in the future," Gardner said.
Gardener said that arguments that police intervention in certain protests would escalate tensions are "credible."
"[...] But that does not excuse or explain why the police failed to act when called on to protect individuals under attack or when violence reached a level that deaths or injuries were inevitable," he said.
Gardner said that the response from the authorities since the protests has been "equally bad."
"[...] With provisions within the 'domestic security package' granting police extra authority to use firearms an invitation to apply arbitrary and abusive force, increasing the likelihood of abuses still further," he added.
Following the protests, in March 2015 Parliament passed provisions giving the police more authority.
According to the bill, police can use weapons against those who attack schools, public buildings and places of worship with Molotov bombs, explosives, inflammable materials and other weapons.
Moreover, the bill criminalizes the use of "fireworks, Molotovs, iron balls and straps" in public meetings or demonstrations.
Those who cover their faces partly or entirely during demonstrations that turn into a "propaganda march" for a terrorist organization may face sentences of up to five years in prison.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment