(MENAFNEditorial)
These documents should be seen by Judges and ruled upon by a Court which is why the Inventor is still hoping the United States Supreme Court will hear the case. The inventor alleges that both the FCC and the USPTO are in gross violation of her civil and constitutional rights .
The Internet does have an inventor who has been completely overlooked and these discussions regarding Net Neutrality and “free and open access to the Internet is just a deliberate attempt to 'bamboozle' the public while at the same time suppressing evidence and violating the constitutional rights of a minority. The suppression of the truth and these acts by the USPTO to cover up their actions while violating the constitutional rights of the Inventor are illegal. The FCC moving to continue suppression of the truth is illegal unless the Federal Government declares imminent domain over the Internet and compensates the inventor.
Net Neutrality is a myth because there still exists the question about the true nature of intellectual property rights regarding the Internet. The determination of the Internet is not clear. It appears Federal Government owned which is now trying to change it to a public utility to be distributed by rules determined by the FCC to private or public agencies. The CEO of ABFY SELLERS GROUP alleges that ideas to having ordinary consumers online which led to the development of Internet 2 were her ideas. It was not the concern of the FCC or the federal government at the time. For 25 years her rights have been completely ignored while credit and opportunity for the Internet has to the technology community which has become very wealthy and the federal government which has grown very powerful. No consideration whatsoever has been given to Ms. Hartman's rights as its inventor. See her 2008 comments to the FCC in the link below.
http://smartphoneselectronicsaccessories.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FCC-Opposition-to-Petitions-by-Hartman-.pdf
Dorothy M. Hartman is African-American and female. She says that she and her intellectual property rights are being exploited and that no good will come of the government steamrolling over her constitutional rights without Due Process. Using telecommunications for profit and to lift the economy out of recession access to ordinary consumers and businesses were the ideas of this inventor – not the FCC or the Federal Government. View the link below to read excerpts from her original writings to the Small Business Innovation Research Program - its overseer the National Science Foundation under the U.S. Department of Commerce. The same department which oversees the USPTO.
http://smartphoneselectronicsaccessories.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Excerpts-from-Hartman-1990.thru_.1991.Proposals1.pdf
These documents should be seen by Judges and ruled upon by a Court which is why the Inventor is still hoping the United States Supreme Court will hear the case. The inventor alleges that both the FCC and the USPTO are in gross violation of her civil and constitutional rights. The Internet does have an inventor who has been completely overlooked and these discussions regarding Net Neutrality and "free and open access to the Internet is just a deliberate attempt to “bamboozle” the public while at the same time suppressing evidence and violating the constitutional rights of a minority. The suppression of the truth and these acts by the USPTO to cover up their actions while violating the constitutional rights of the Inventor are illegal. The FCC moving to continue suppression of the truth is illegal unless the Federal Government declares “Eminent Domain “ over the Internet and compensates the Inventor. Blacks have been devalued in this nation thus government policy has been to ignore the inventor's rights rather than grant her justice. The Inventor's original writings and proposals (above) only partially represented here submitted to the federal government from 1990 for over two years does constitute intellectual property regarding this invention. Below is a PDF of Inventor's Patent Application Publication. Full details regarding the application Number 11003123 can be found at the USPTO.gov website under Public Pair. When reduced to practice use of the Accessing Accessibility Process comprises the Internet.
http://smartphoneselectronicsaccessories.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Hartman-Patent-Application.RD_.pdf
The INTERNET (called by only one name or World Wide Web internationally) came into existence as a direct result of this inventor's writings on Accessing Accessibility to the Federal Government – pointing out the advantages of using the infinity of Cyberspace for building contacts between businesses and customers. The infinity of Cyberspace does not make the invention infinite because the invention itself is bounded by the need for machinery. This led directly to research and development of these ideas by the National Science Foundation which through its research and development expanded the telecommunications networks and capabilities and developed commercial programming. The results of all of this expansion and integration of ideas and technology has resulted in this huge network which continues to evolve. The revolution of explosion of phone companies as Internet Service Providers computer companies and software applications and other technologies leading to the revolutionary INTERNET and subsequent WORLDWIDE WEB are the results of the government paying attention to and adopting the ideas of commercialization by the inventor. Her ideas made the difference between having an Internet at all and not having one as Internet 1 or the previous Internet based on the Arpanet was ended in 1990. Yet she has received no recognition nor compensation for what some truly consider to be the greatest invention of the 20th Century.
Media Contact
Company Name: ABFY SELLERS GROUP
Contact Person: Diana
Email: diana4500@comcast.net
Phone: 800-593-5820
City: Philadelphia
State: PA
Country: United States
Website: http://www.telecomstraighttalk.com
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.